9 Linux Myths Debunked

Published on August 18, 2008 in General by Rami Taibah

Linux Faces FUD

If you enjoyed this article, then I would recommend to also read The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Linux Users and Etymology of A Distro. Enjoy!

When it comes to Linux there are 3 4 kinds of people, those who never heard of it, those who love it, those who are afraid of it, and those who hate it and spread falsities about it. I don’t really care about the first, they probably aren’t really technologically literate anyways, as long as they have E-mail they are content. While the third  group is the result of the actions of the fourth. Let’s hit two birds with one stone shall we?

1-Linux is More Secure Because it Has A Smaller User Base

It is widely argued that Linux is more secure than Windows just because Windows is more popular, so hackers and virus coders tend to focus on the more popular platform. Actually, this is just one side of the story There are so many other things running for Linux security-wise that totally dispels this myth.

First of all, let’s face it, YOU are the weakest link in any OS. The user is the one that wreaks havoc to any OS, with ignorance or miscalculated decisions. Linux users are generally more savvy than the Windows or Mac users out there. We don’t just click on files promising us the latest Hollywood diva nude pictures. Besides, it’s normal practice that Linux users don’t run their systems as root, which is not the case with Windows, this drastically brings down the vulnerability of any system. The question now, will this be the case if Linux gains popularity and more adoption? I don’t really know, but if Linux commanded more than 90% of the market, I believe this argument would be totally false.

Linux with it’s Unix roots is built as a Network Operating System (NOS) and now advancing slowly as a Desktop OS (DOS? ironically). This simple fact helped Linux carry on the legacy of network security model of server/client-user with limited permissions. Whilst an OS like Windows was originally built as a single-user Desktop OS advancing into a NOS and adding security layers on the go.

Finally, just the fact that Linux is Open Source means that more eyeballs can see bugs and vulnerabilities making it easier to patch. Any coder in his/her mom’s basement could issue a fix for the community. It doesn’t need a big fat layer of corporate bureaucracy to issue a fix! Granted that the corporation gives the security flaw enough attention.

2-Installing Applications on Linux is Hard

Well this might have been true in the early days of Linux, but currently it can’t be farther from the truth. As a Linux user, what do I have to do to install an app? Let’s assume I want to this in a a GUI only environment (some get turned off by the mere mention of a command line, for some reason beyond me.) All I have to do is launch the graphical frontend of my package manager (think of it a big ass repository of applications stored on a server some where), then search for the app in mind. Hell if you don’t know the exact name of the application just search for the function! For example if you want to install a Gmail alerter, just type “google” or “gmail”, a plethora of apps will appear, then tick on the one you like and click ok. The package manager will automatically download the required files from the Internet and install it, and place it in your menu!

On the other hand, if you want to install an app on Windows what will you do? Generally you will head to Google and search for the required app or function, swim through hundreds if not thousands of results, randomly choose one which might or might not have what you want. If it does you will be probably asked for a valid email or enter a captcha, then download the file. The file might be huge and if you don’t have a download manager you might lose all what you downloaded because your wireless abruptly decided to disconnect. There are 101 scenarios! If all goes well you double click on the app, click next next, tick on “I Agree”, a couple more nexts and you have the app. Which turns out to be a stripped down trial version, that added a couple of more apps that you didn’t ask for on your desktop and changed a few of your system settings!

Which is easier again?

3-Linux is A Nightmare to Install

Back in 2005 when I first started my Linux adventure, I got my hand on 5 SUSE cd’s from a  Linux Format magazine. Back then I was on XP, I initially wanted to back up my files before I take the plunge just in case. When I looked at the huge amount of files, I got lazy and somewhat careless, and decided just to install SUSE without backing up. 2 hours later I had a magical dual boot system (the whole concept of dual boot was alien to me back then) and all my files were intact!

Why am I telling you this story? Because I think one part of the intimidation of installing Linux is the belief that it might destroy files and end up on an OS that might thats not appealing (hey we are humble to realize it’s not for everyone ;) ) All I am saying it’s piss easy! If I was able to do it with no prior knowledge of Linux then you can too! It just needs some common sense. Trust me!

And if you don’t trust me (I understand you don’t really know me do you?) Why don’t you dabble with Linux using virtualization?

Anyways the whole installation process has been tuned over the years. Distros like SUSE, Ubuntu, and Fedora, are so easy to install it would literally take around 30 minutes to get it up and ready. With almost all the apps a default PC should have. Thing like an Office suite, media player, PDF reader, chat clients…etc Can you really say the same about YOUR system?

4-The Linux Interface is Ugly and Unattractive

Well it depends on the definition of “attractive” doesn’t it? A command line only OS might be a turn off for most people but bliss for some. An interface with wobbly windows, rotating cubes, spherical desktop, fireworks, rain, snow…etc is bliss to a lot and a resource hog to some.

Well Linux provides you both and everything in between! And in a million and one styles!

You can install Compiz, which gives you rotating cubes for different desktops, wobbly windows, animated window behavior just to name a few. You can install Enlightenment, which provides you a sleek looking desktop that you have never seen before. KDE4 is a scene to behold! Anyways I think a picture is worth a thousand words,  here judge by yourself:

Linux and the Compiz Cube It\'s Snowing in Linux Land enlightenment-e17

In fact you can actually make Linux like whatever you want, you can make it even look like Apple or Windows! The sky is the limit ;)

5-There Are No Games on Linux

Actually I am not really a PC gamer, I tend to keep my gaming activities on consoles, but I once installed Football Manager under Linux, worked perfectly.

Seriously, just yesterday I walked into my brother’s room, and  found a collection of PC games on the floor. Me knowing that he uses Linux exclusively, I raised an eyebrow and asked “under Linux?”. He replied positively, “without a hitch!”

Today, there are literally 100′s of games that work under Linux, true they haven’t been ported, but Wine (a program that allows Windows programs to run under Linux) has taken care of that. Just looking at the top 10 list of apps working under Wine, one finds quite a lot of them are games. And a lot of them are VERY popular! Wine could also help in a lot of other games too! You can also purchase Cedega which depends on Wine but makes the experience much more user-friendly. There is a lot of help out there, you just need to open your eyes a bit! And if all fails, virtualization could be a last resort!

Word of Worldcraft Running on Linux using Wine

One could still argue that there are no Linux games, as all that this means that there are no native Linux games. Right? Not really, there are loads of native Open Source Linux games, I can’t really vouch for them, but from the screen shots they do seem cool. Here have a glimpse.

6-Linux Doesn’t Come Preinstalled Like Windows

Whoa! You have been contaminated with a big dose of FUD! Actually Linux comes preinstalled from a lot of different vendors. Some are international brands like Dell and Lenovo. There are also some specialized Linux vendors like System76 or EmprorLinux.

Asus also have created a new trend. Fitting Linux in a new niche market, the Ultra Mobile PC market with the Eee PC. HP, Aspire, MSI, among others are fitting these UMPC’s with Linux.

7-There is No Support for Linux

If you purchased your Linux system from a vendor, then there will probably some kind of support. A quick check on System76 or EmprorLinux would verify that. Also if you bought a distribution from Red Hat or Novell then you will also get support as part of the package.

However in reality, a lot of Linux users are mavericks, they get their support from the Linux community. The Linux community is very supportive (at least that is my experience). The Internet is riddled with forums, guides, howtos, blogs, IRC rooms… etc that would offer anybody an extraordinary amount of help. I don’t think that any other operating system has this kind of community. I am sure when it comes to community other proprietary operating systems do envy us!

8-Linux Doesn’t Have Good Hardware Support

Sometime ago, I blogged about how I suffered to get an HP printer to work on Windows. Long story short, after around 2 hours of trying to get an HP printer to work on XP, I gave up and plugged into an Ubuntu Linux Eee PC, it got recognized in 30 seconds! There are thousands of stories similar to this, just a quick Google would confirm that. Here is an example.

What people fail to realize that in the case of their Windows preinstalled PC’s, they “just works” because the vendors have already done all the work for them. It would be a totally different ball game if these PC’s had no OS on them. Windows wouldn’t come out all that superior, I would even wager that Linux would probably do a better job.

Actually I think that we are at a point where I can say that Linux would work more than 90% of hardware out there! Could Windows or Apple claim that? I don’t know, I stopped being a Windows power user for quite sometime. But what I remember is that a webcam I purchased in 2004 wasn’t “digitally verified” (or something like that) by XP, despite the fact that XP has been around for years!

9-There is No Office Software, or Software At All for Linux

Huh? Under which rock have you been living under in the past decade? Actually there is more Office software for Linux than Windows and Apple combined. It does 95% of what Microsoft Office can do and you don’t need to loose an arm and a leg to get it, its FREE! And let’s face it, most of us don’t really use Microsoft Office to it’s full potential. So why should I pay 100% for only 10% features I need?

As for the rest of software, rest assured that there is replacement for everything you need. And in a lot of cases these apps get the job done in better ways than their propietary counterparts. And before you say: “Photoshop”, you won’t drag me into this conversation, if you are not content with Gimp, you still can get Photoshop on Linux, so please let’s not get into that.

Bonus: Linux is For Geeks!

Ahh, nevermind not really gonna try to refute this one, though I tried to convince people that Linux is sexy, didn’t really do a good job at it! But hey geek is good ;)

About

Rami Taibah the founder of The Linuxologist and a self proclaimed geek and Linux aficionado. This fall, he will be pursuing an MIMS degree at UC Berkeley, California. You can follow him on Twitter @rtaibah.

«

»

  • http://toddpartridge.wordpress.com Todd Partridge

    I hate listening too all the FUD about Linux drivers. Now A days they run dam good and newer models get an update about pretty soon. yeah, If you want Linux its a good idea to shop about for the right computer. MacBooks, T61… all word right out of the box for most ppl. It’s been my experience that new high-end computers in windows often don’t have mature drivers either.

  • tracyanne

    quote:Distros like SUSE, Ubuntu, and Fedora, are so easy to install it would literally take around 30 minutes to get it up and ready.

    You forgot to mention that Mandriva Linux is one of the easiest Linux distributions to install. You also forgot to mention that Mandriva Linux actually installs on a wider range of hardware than the three distributions you did mention. Yous neglected, also, to mention that Mandriva Linux is also easier to use than Ubuntu (which is marketed as the easy to use Linux), and that Mandriva Linux has been like this for the 10 years of it’s existence (Mandriva Linux was originally call Mandrake Linux).

    Mandriva Linux was developed with ease of use and ease of installation in mind, and while many other distributions have caught up to it in this respect, it hs, by virtue of the GUI tools, that no other Linux distribution has (drakconf), much easier for a new to Linux person to use, as unlike Ubuntu, Mandriva Linux does not require that a first time Linux user learn CLI commands.

    So please when you are writing about easy to use Linux distributions, don’t forget Mandriva Linux is still probably the easiest Linux to use, for new Linux users, and that Mandriva who build a technically excellent distribution in Mandriva Linux, are very very serious about ease of use.

  • Trevor

    Typos:
    with it’s Unix roots –> with its Unix roots
    to it’s full potential –> to its full potential

  • http://www.smartassproducts.com OldLinuxGeek

    The only thing I really disagree with is your opening comment: “When it comes to Linux there are 3 kinds of people, those who never heard of it, those who are afraid of it, and those who hate it and spread falsities about it.” Ummmm…aren’t there FOUR kinds of people? What about us Linux users?!

  • Baldy

    There are even more kinds of people – what about experienced computer users who are not afraid of Linux, don’t hate it, but just don’t like it? You’re too quick to be dismissive of people who don’t share your viewpoint.

  • JAFO

    Mandriva is the BEST distro for the newbie…….just installed current Spring 2008 on 6 year old Toshiba laptop 1115-S103 as dual boot with XP…everything worked out of box…

  • icem4n

    I really want to support this article, but I can’t because it is half full of misleading garbage. LINUX has come aLONG way, but it is no where near as easy to deal with as Windows. Security-wise Windows gets patched faster (and in some cases lessoften) then other OS’s.

    Arguing that LINUX is a great desktop platform coming from a NOS is also an interesting approach. I’d say from the security paragraph POV you’d still want Windows as your Desktop and LINUX for servers.

  • http://ibeentoubuntu.com Daeng Bo
  • Parminder

    reply for : bsdgroup

    If the reply preceding my reply is for me, then i want to tell you that the reply was to tell people that games do work fine on linux!

    Probably you misunderstood it!
    never mind, great post!

  • http://marcvz.net/blog Marc

    Football Manager? You should have mentioned that World of Warcraft works with Wine.

    For a serious gamer, Windows is the only option. If you don’t play games, there is no reason to use Windows.

  • otheos

    There is one big proble with Linux. It’s not productive.

    Don’t get me wrong. You sit down to get some work done and all you end up doing is playing around with the OS instead. Great fun but unproductive.

    Seriously, I had to go back to XP to actually produce some work and left Linux for leisure on my spare box. Couple of days later I swapped OSs and boxes. My “production” XP box is now the spare one, sort of the working suit, the one that you do feel bad using, and the Linux box, now upgraded to the latest available (in my house at least) hardware is the enjoyable part.

    Like I said though, my linux box hardly produces any work. Even non professional work I mean. I know how to rip a DVD and trascode it to divx but I’d rather have it done on the XP box and play a bit with iptables on the linux box.

    See what I mean…

  • DW

    “6-Linux Doesn’t Come Preinstalled Like Windows”

    You left zareason.com out of the list.

  • Bocskai Csaba

    I use Debian Linux for almost a year. At work, I use it 95 % of my time. I love it.
    BUT…if you can show me ONE music production software that equals at least FL Studio, you get the Nobel. Don’t tell me about LMMS, Rezound or similar shitz! Those are for 8 year old kids. And Wine is not capable of running FL with 100 % capabilities and low audio latency.
    I repeat: I love Debian as it is, but cannot say it has it all.

  • http://nix4all.com Unix Dude

    Totally right
    Linux is for people who like free stuff!
    Linux is for people who are smart enough to try something new
    Linux simpler one you got the hang of it
    Linux has a community of a couple million members that are willing to help you when you are in need.

  • Eric Olivier LEBIGOT (EOL)

    “I can say that Linux would work more than 90% of hardware out there! Could Windows or Apple claim that? I don’t know, I stopped being a Windows power user for quite sometime.”

    Apple can probably claim a hardware compatibility close to 100%: since they build most of the hardware themselves, there is virtually no hardware problem with OS X on any Apple machine. As for 3rd party hardware, the fact that they work with OS X is virtually always made explicit.

  • Pingback: Re: 9 miti da sfatare su Linux « Bruce0wayne’s Weblog

  • otheos

    There is a basic misconception about linux.

    Linux is simple. But simple doesn’t necessarily mean easy.

    People tend to confuse easy with simple.

    For example. It is simple to type a well syntaxed command in cli that performes a sequence of actions that would otherwise require opening a few windows, browsing their tabs, reading all the descriptions, checking a multiple of tick boxes, and click apply.

    Simple but not easy, as typing the command in cli requires you to know exactly what you want to do, to have learned the syntax and all the programs involved in the actions you need to perform.

    Conversely you follow an obvious procedure by opening a window, seeing what it does and chosing what you want to do.

    The difference between windows and Linux is that the former is easy but not simple, while the latter is definitely simple and if needed can also be made easy.

  • ubuntuUser

    You can preach as much as you want. As long as i plugin my HP Printer into a PC running Linux (ubuntu) and it doesn’t work and i try the same for mac but this time IT DOES jsut work. (not to mention webcam or scanner issues…)

    And again i know its a user specific opinion but: i don’t miss the console AT ALL when doing thing at my mac.
    ( so nice to drag and drop applciations and to install/uninstall them this way :)
    For the pure enduser which doesn’t want to “administrate” his OS but just “use” it, Linux has still way too go. But its on it way , where its leading we’ll see about that.
    BTW: OpenOffice is really nice ( and runs on my mac too :D )

    so go on preaching i know how far linux is and so i stick with my mac :P

  • Mohammad

    I am using Linux as desktop, I’m agree with all you said, except
    the package manager and installing new applications in linux is sometimes very very very hard and also about the look,
    the look in windows is better, bc configuring the X11 to use the best of lcd, graphic card, fonts, …. is almost impossible.
    Linux is for geeks.

  • http://www.techzilo.com Sumesh

    Spot on about Linux being easy to install. I recently tried to update my Wubi-based install of Ubuntu, and got interrupted. What do I do? Head over to Windows XP (the first time in a month), uninstall and reinstall Ubuntu, and I’m back in less than 30 minutes.

    When was the last time you could claim the same about Windows? :)

  • Pingback: 9 miti da sfatare su Linux « johnny84 weblog

  • Pingback: links for 2008-08-24 | it's about time

  • Pingback: RandomChatter » Blog Archive » TC_008: Comment Snobs

  • SOAD

    What an asshole. Like most Linux Liars, you cherry pick the best examples and sweep the rest under the rug. Fuck you for lying to people. Rami Taibah? Go back to India.

  • http://hehe2.net Rami Taibah

    @SOAD, It would of made your comment much more effective if you constructively debated my article instead of flaming. Lots of people over on this thread called me out on stuff in a a civilized fashion, which apparently you lack.

    Back to India? Funny how you meant that to be degrading, yet India is considered one of the best if not the best when it come to IT. Haven’t you heard?

  • Pingback: Falsos mitos de Linux II « Un Bioinformatiquillo

  • http://www.koraycaglar.com.tr koraycaglar

    I have four computers, all of which run linux; while one of them dual boots both windows and linux. Two of my computers (a fujitsu notebook and an acer notebook) are used at the office. I can do all of my work with the maximum p.r.o.d.u.c.t.i.v.i.t.y (Office applications, erp server and clients, printers, etc. At home I’ve got a medion digitainer media center operated perfectly by ubuntu and a power-pc where I play games. I keep the windows partition on the power-pc just for two games: simcity4 (for me) and sims2 (for my wife); I can play all the other games on the Linux partition.
    As a linux user (not developer or geek) I can say that I have forgotten about headaches, ass-pains and any computer-related troubles since I tried linux in 2001.
    Thanks for the article RAMI.
    Soad: try to be a human, ok?

  • http://www.koraycaglar.com.tr koraycaglar

    By the way, any beginners who might be worried about adaptation or difficulties should try “pardus”. It is a linux distro available in English, Spanish, German, Dutch and Turkish. The best thing is that it comes with drivers for Nvidia, Ati, atheros, broadcom, etc cards; and it can play dvds, mp3, divxs and any other media out of the box. The fastest and the best package manager (pisi) I’ve ever tried also comes with pardus. Just download and try: http://pardus.org.tr/eng/index.html

  • http://hehe2.net Rami Taibah

    @koraycaglar, thanks for your comments. I have heard a lot of great things Pardus, I will eventually try it out lol.

    About SOAD: Ignore him he is just a troll…

  • Pingback: Why is the penguin is crawling? | yabBLOG

  • Dan

    Heh. Nice arguments. Good one.
    I use Linux all the time when I can help it, it’s just so damn cool! Fancy helping us make a REALLY EASY TO USE Web OS with an optional base underneath of Linux?
    Does anyone else fancy a go?
    If so drop me a line at dandart googlemail “dot” com
    (nospam haha)

  • vlad

    I completely agree with you about the command line. It’s not scary! There are thousands of sites with exact step-by-step instructions on how to use all of the linux distributions. All you do is copy and paste the commands into the terminal.

  • Pingback: $> eat BionicApple » Blog Archive » Just Some Text. That is Blue.

  • Pingback: Microsoft's Best Buy Lies About Linux Debunked

  • Pingback: Fan boys/girls take note | PC Mechanics Blog